The Barrier of the Senses    Aug 08, 2009    I.D. 1344

One of the best opportunities to make discoveries in this field is by the study of the senses and I mean strictly in a figmental way. No theory, conjecture, idea or pause is to be tolerated. That’s the figmental way and falls under the category of Non-Theory. This is a very restrictive science and almost nothing is allowed so even the tiniest breakthrough is a revelation. Think of when it was discovered that the senses were not an avenue that the brain used to feel or see the world around it but rather an excuse for it not to be there, a barrier that the brain could use to convince itself it was a brain. If you are finding this chapter difficult then I suggest you go back and work on the previous ones until you can accept all that has been said. At this point we are discussing the thoughts of thoughts or rather thinking about thinking and many things are taken for granted. You already understand that you do not have a brain at all, You pretend that you do, but you don’t. You already understand that there is no need to ever pray again because you are talking to yourself and also communicating with everyone else on a subliminal level. Your back is plastered to an apparent globe that you are not only part of but that globe is in fact what you are and what your brain or rather mind is. Others within your sphere are plastered to the globe as well and the side that you cannot see of them does not exist. From their perspective all of these same rules apply but you or they can never know if the other is actually cognizant. That’s a toughie but has to be tolerated (Solipsism) and is due to some of our basic limitations, namely the barrier of the senses.

Enlightenment is actually pretty easy. First your teacher will expect you to read everything and that could take years to plow through hundreds of scriptures, then she or he will instruct you that Atman is Brahman (Hindu) meaning the one is the whole or You are God. Then you will be taught that You are not only THE spirit but ONLY spirit and not material. Or you could just drop into my office one afternoon and I could tell you that "There is no God and everything is imaginary" and when you were able to accept that you would be enlightened, simple as that. Well the challenge is the ’acceptance’ part. As mentioned those that are privy to this way of thinking still operate on two levels and have two ways of thinking. It’s a mantra "There are Two Ways of Thinking" You can walk on the ground and think that if you dug down toward China you would come to magma and then you would have to tunnel through that some how..what am I saying? Or you can walk on the ground and marvel at how such a thin layer feels so solid to your feet and remind yourself that it’s just a projection of your brain (mind) and as in a dream you are still dreaming.

The discovery that the senses were a barrier to the brain was hardly noticed when it occurred but it was momentous in the development of modern figmentalism. All the clues are right there in front of us. When you are asleep you use arms and eyes that are not in existence other than in your own mind. These are another set of manufactured senses that don’t work very well when you dream. Again transpose the dream conditions to the awake world. Your mind has the ability to manufacture both sound and ears to hear these sounds when you are asleep as it does when you wake. You may argue that there is a difference but your brain cannot detect that. Many feel that we could not manufacture our own pain and this is the proof against Idealism or figmentalism but again the facts are there, because we do experience distress and pain within a dream. This last point is probably the most important one and each individual has much difficulty abandoning God to bear the pain and degradation of life and death alone. You may have a bit of solace in the fact that we die everytime we fall asleep and that’s all there is to it.

When you reach out to feel the edge of a table in order to contemplate it’s existence as a solid object you are instructing your eyes and ears to assist in this exercise. Your hand feels the firm wood of the table and might make a slight sound as the skin rubs on the table and your eyes dutifully record every move, store them in memory and quickly forget the most of it. Your mind or thoughts need the hands, ears and eyes to experience the table because it has no other way apart from dreaming or contemplating it (remembering) to experience it but it’s important to note that these two other ways are no less a way of experiencing the table than within reality. The mind can think about a table that it remembers, one that it is planning to purchase or build and has never seen before, or dream about them or experience them in reality and all three condition are exactly the same to the brain. The senses in reality are most apparent, in dreaming somewhat less and in contemplation less again but the brain knows not any real difference. It should be reminded that memory is created out of whole cloth when it is needed and there really is no such a thing as real memory. We do not actually have the ability to remember but we do have the ability to convince ourselves that our memory is accurate and real. (You may find this difficult) What we know as time is actually the dimensionalization of a moment in which a thought is piled on another and another so that the illusion of memory is created in the short term and seems utterly provable but Non-Theory does not allow this. How thought is apparently dimensionalized into apparent time is utterly unknown and no postulation is allowed. Thought remains the only process (Perfect Elegance - "Thought is the only Process" and it’s corollary: "Even Memory is an Illusion").

As humans we have such a penchant to grasp concepts and theorize them into convincing reality. No theory bears scrutiny so that’s why they are not used here. The two main weaknesses can be reviewed here: The space conundrum prevents all theories and theologies from having an outwardly generated space to exist. (remember that figmentalism is not a theory nor theology but rather composed only of things that we already know such as [’We Exist’]) The space conundrum is: Space cannot be describe as having no edge since this is impossible to conceive nor can it be with an edge since it would require a container. This only applies to outwardly generated space and not the figmental sphere of reality in which we exist. Outwardly generated infinite space is the general mainstream norm of modern science and is described as infinite meaning ’not actually described’. So all theories are based on their existence within the constraints of a space that cannot actually be described. Those are not really theories and in fact no theory can actually be tested with this and pass, save fig/idealism (which is not a theory). The other main weakness of all scientific theories in the matter or material problem. Some scientists use the word mass but there can be no mass unless you have a method to describe how it could be manufactured out of nothing. As mentioned they use anti-matter and black holes to do this but those things are utterly theoretical and have never been proved to exist. We are only able to appreciate apparent matter/mass/material and pretend it is real.

Laws of Reality    Plus ES Law and Nes Law

INTS    The Institute of Non-Theoretical Science

General Interest Galleries    Real Rufus

Namron Soar Mail    Nsoar@tbaytel.net

Drugs and the Mind    http://www.acidprogram.com

©