*************** Nonreal Entitic Science (NES Law)  -  Discussion ***************

"Voice for 2nd Draft"   Home    Back to Laws    Back

~~~~~ Unreality or Nonreality ~~~~~Third Draft~ Nov 28 2007.

Unreality is the lack of existence of the lack of existence.

Even the recognition of nonreality would cause existence.

If anything is possible, everything would result.

The impossibility factor of nonreality would have to be absolute, not so with reality. Therefore the possibility is in favor of reality.

Nonreality could not exist. The state of non-existence could not be practiced in the non-void of non-reality.

The conditions required for reality would always exist, therefore no beginning.

Discussion   "Voice"

Contemplating how or why we exist or where we came from inevitably leads to the concept of nonreality or nonexistence which is utterly impossible to imagine since one would have to first remove the stars, the planets and ourselves leaving only empty space. This seems to be possible to conceive apart from the difficulty of answering the question of just how far the space reaches and trying to imagine this condition to be infinite. Our minds cannot get around such a concept because of the "container conundrum". Space cannot be either limited nor unlimited but when you try to imagine the very space as not existing, nor the space for the space itself, our minds go into full arrest. Yet we continue to use nonexistence as a balance for existence because it is such an obvious conceptual default. One could even argue that if nothing existed there would be no need for such a concept because that too would be gone, thus the first NES law: Unreality is the lack of existence of the lack of existence. Largely an exercise in semantics, oxymoron’s and double negatives, the main features of NES law would be that the condition of nonexistence must be respected as a balancing factor and also an overriding factor in that we must somehow exist without doing so in a truly material sense. We must be strictly ethereal. As is the case with the "Laws of Reality" and "Entitic Science" there is much overlapping and redundancy and it is fairly obvious that these things cannot be truly communicated. They are primarily written in this point form to dismiss many of the currently held views such as a beginning to life and the universe, material or matter as our founding evolution and the belief that anything is real beyond thought.

~~~~~ Unreality or Nonreality ~~~~~Second Draft~ Jan 04 2007.

Unreality is the lack of existence of the lack of existence.

Even the recognition of nonreality would cause existence.

If anything is possible, everything would result.

The impossibility factor of nonreality would have to be absolute, therefore as equally impossible as reality.

Nonreality could not exist, it is only a theoretical state proposed by the entity to explain it’s existence.

The conditions required for reality would always exist, therefore no beginning.

Unreality or Nonreality ~First Draft~ Dec 23 2006.

Unreality is the lack of existence of the lack of existence.

Even the recognition of nonreality would cause existence.

If there is anything there is everything.

The impossibility factor of nonreality would have to be absolute, therefore as equally impossible as reality.

Namron Soar

©