Proof of Figmentalism
"Voice" Home Plain Background View this Fractal Original Proof Document
Updated Proof Document ID proof~427 Oct 3, 2007
As already mentioned the word figmentalism means nothing but the developments that it claims are very unique and quite new. These things could have been voiced before, or perhaps written and in part, have been. What has been referred to as "Personal Idealism" meaning the personal experience of life itself has always recognized that we have no other concrete explanation of reality short of our own internal view. However it seems that few have found this to be a view worth following or expounding on, save those that have wrestled with bare bones philosophy, and were allowed, by convention to do so.
One of the main reasons that Idealism has failed to be fully developed by history’s philosophers is the very problem of convention. If the Church had a strong position in any local, or if the very convention of philosophy itself had a hold on the thinkers of the time then their convictions would be tainted and their proclamations accommodating and largely impotent. This age has many proponents of nonreligious philosophy and with the advent of string theory, which is admittedly largely philosophical, the time is correct for this perspective to find the light of day.
At the very least it isn’t necessary to accept the so called "Laws of Reality" without realizing that it’s a complete other perspective separate from theology and conventional realism. Schools have refused to continue to teach Religion due to secularism but continue to instruct all pupils in all grades about evolution from stone as if it were proved. Now there is proof that we did not evolve from a pinpoint of some strange mass that cataclysmically exploded into our present universe. The proof is that matter either exists as a founding entity or it does not and one of those is a very common theory with out a shred of proof. Figmentalism states that matter does not exist and until there is proof otherwise it must stand as an absolute statement.
Non-theory was developed out of figmentalism and then anti-theory followed. The latter disallows all theoretical and theological statements and presents only what we already know within our own existence. It relies on the simple absolute that "We Exist" and we only know our world through experience of our senses that appear to be self generated as if in a dream. The main proof of figmentalism is that is does not postulate, theorize or theocratize, is based on the fact of existence and cannot be proved wrong or even doubted, by the dint of any present theory.
Original Proof Document "Voice"
Proving that our state of being has certain parameters not previously accepted is heresy. If you rely on mathematics for scientific proof of a postulation then you use a faulty system. The inflexible nature of present day mathematics is what will condemn it to historical error. There is no mathematical equation for a finite universe nor an infinite one, nor one nested in indescribable non-space. Our universe must have edges and the limitless thought beyond is proof of an ethereal world. Mathematics are created for a finite universe and simply ignore that which is beyond. A reality based on material would have no beginning and no end. Material could not spontaneously occur nor cease to occur without some force of creation. Matter would always be there in some state of flux. The present concept of time conflicts with the obvious. A material-based reality could not have a singular-event beginning that began time, and without that, present day mathematics is speculative, theoretical and fundamentally incorrect. In theory 2 = 2 (to use a simple equation as an example) but in actual practice no two things of any sort will equal two others of the same sort. Two metal balls could be machined to match two others with great precision but they would not weigh precisely the same nor have the same topography. Theoretical things like electrons could seem quite equal but even those would show the simple difference of not occupying the same space simultaneously.
We conceived the atom and slowly developed it’s physical appearance in a purely theoretical form. We decided that it must be globe shaped to fill the void most efficiently. We created equations to explain the remaining spaces between these globes and avoided a more complex shape that would fill the void completely, for the sake of simplicity. Later in our history we developed powerful electron microscopes that allowed us to see the intricate matrix of matter. Experience with atomic power generation, particle accelerators and nuclear weapons convinced us we had a good model. Lately, tunneling electron microscopes have revealed what appears to be somewhat globe shaped atoms comprising the molecules we also designed. In science the actualization always follows the theoretical design. We always design these things but we have difficulty realizing that we also create them too.
The best proof that could be offered is that once you begin to dismiss the belief of a matter-borne surrounding it is difficult, if not impossible to go back. Things suddenly begin to make much more sense. In all the possible surroundings we could have found ourselves this blue and green world of ours is most ideal indeed. Could it possible be produced by the mindless evolution of matter alone? Could that sterile force have placed humanity into this most unusual time in our history? The answer to both these questions regardless of figmentalism is quite possibly a "yes" but the "matter" of which we speak would be very different indeed, from our present model. The atom of today requires the elusive independent particles composed of what we refer to as quarks and now tentatively call strings. Science is propelled by scientists and their human pride won’t readily allow them to admit to an error. They will find a way to include the historic quark and develop it as a parent to string theory. They will be even less willing to accept the notion that insentient matter cannot be isolated nor exists, but every evidence they produce supports this to date. In other words there is no present evidence from scientific experiment to overturn the truly figmental nature of atomic theory.
In these times we have learned to graph events. If a history or time line is used as a horizontal base and the incidence level is represented by the vertical, then all pertinent graphs would show a similar trace. The horizontal line would rise gradually as it reached our present evolution and then turn sharply to the vertical as incidence increased. Most evident would be the curves of world population, technical development, world communication and the more mundane graphs showing garbage and pollution production. All charted events regarding our time show a sharp turn represented by 90 degrees on a graph. This places us in a position of departure from all previous ways of thinking. The times in which we find ourselves are suddenly undergoing a cataclysm never before recorded.
Proof of anything can never be much more than consensus and that is all part of the human condition and limitations. Primarily we concur that we do indeed exist. How or why will probably never be known. Proving that we generate our existence from within ourselves is more a matter of refusing to believe it’s generated elsewhere.Namron Soar
"my apologies to mathematicians and scientists"